Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lou Hill

:{{la|Lou Hill}}

The article has a link to a dead/unfound webpage as its only reference; tried moving the page to draftspace but that was reverted, so this seems to be the proper avenue. WeWorkGuest (talk) 08:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)(sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC))

• Keep. He is a former member of parliament and a clear pass of WP:NPOL, with a reference link that was broken but replaceable in seconds with the most basic Google search. (The citation gave you all the information you need to find it, since the source still exists, just had a URL change!). {{ping|WeWorkGuest}} no, draftifying and then nominating for deletion is not the "proper avenue" when someone explicitly meets the relevant notability criteria but just had a reference with a dead URL and you were literally too lazy to whack the key parts of the citation into Google. I had intended to revert further back to the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lou_Hill&oldid=1041762678 long-standing version], which made his notability more obvious than the recently-edited text by someone with a possible WP:COI. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep Disruptive nomination. No attempt at Before, and OP is now CU blocked as latest sock of user:Awolf58 (AKA user:Mrbeastmodeallday) Meters (talk) 19:14, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.