Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke fon Fabre

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdraw. User:Tintor2 impressively found some usable sources, including scholars. I was wrong at the end. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 22:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

=[[:Luke fon Fabre]]=

:{{la|1=Luke fon Fabre}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Luke fon Fabre}})

Like Yuri Lowell, this article's reception were also filled with passing mentions from the game reviews. Having hard time to find more per WP:BEFORE. Zero WP:SIGCOV. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 07:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements, Video games, and Anime and manga. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Note - for what it's worth, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Luke_fon_Fabre it survived merge discussions] in 2014. Sergecross73 msg me 14:13, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
:Yeah, that time where the standards isn't high yet. GreenishPickle! (🔔) 00:02, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Found and added some sources primarily focused around him.Tintor2 (talk) 01:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Comment. "Zero SIGCOV" is a serious allegation for an article that cites 50-odd sources. Are you willing to do a source analysis to prove this point? Just at a glance, I see multiple published books cited in the ref list. Per WP:SIGCOV, {{xt|significant coverage [...] does not need to be the main topic of the source material}} so mentions within reviews may be significant or not significant but that would be revealed by a detailed source review. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:57, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.