Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M'un'gwu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 17:30, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[M'un'gwu]]=

:{{la|M'un'gwu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/M%27un%27gwu Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|M'un'gwu}})

Possible hoax. I'm far from familiar with Aboriginal culture, but a Google search came up empty and this deity is not listed on two lists of Noongar words ([http://www.noongarculture.org.au/spirituality/], [http://www.noongarculture.org.au/glossary/noongar-word-list/]). Conifer (talk) 07:42, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

::DeleteFails WP:GNG and WP:Verifiability. Could be a WP:HOAX. --Müdigkeit (talk) 09:01, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Delete - Absent evidence of verifiability, and also given the fact that the author also created Double Trouble Twins, which appears to be a likely hoax, it is highly likely this may be a hoax as well. Even if it could be proved that this subject exists, we are still far from any indication of notability. Mz7 (talk) 04:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.