Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MARS model of individual behavior (2nd nomination)

:{{la|MARS model of individual behavior}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/MARS_model_of_individual_behavior_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|MARS model of individual behavior}})

one-off neologism, nn, best merged into something if it can be Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 02:23, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

• Delete Can't find anything good to merge it into. The only on-line reference in the article seems to be a dead link. Couldn't find any other references. Looks like non-notable theory and jargon. Dingo1729 (talk) 15:50, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

: There is at least one other (unrelated) MARS model, Multivariate adaptive regression splines which confuses searches. Dingo1729 (talk) 15:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

• Delete It doesn't seem to be a neologism; the MARS model is described in [http://books.google.com/books?id=qq1XAAAAYAAJ&q=%22MARS+model+of+individual+behavior%22+-wikipedia&dq=%22MARS+model+of+individual+behavior%22+-wikipedia&hl=en&sa=X&ei=a_hJUbiSBYaYiQKfmoCYCg&ved=0CEAQ6AEwBA the book "Organizational Behavior"] and [http://www.radford.edu/~kvharring/docs/OBPowerPoints/OB_chap002.pdf slides based on the book]. But I have not been able to find in-depth sources for the topic outside of this book or the author Steven McShane. It may be that the concept is not widespread. The book and slides count as a reliable source, as it is published by McGraw-Hill, a reputable publisher. But I could not find any others. At present it seems below the threshold for general notability. But there is no prejudice to recreation if more reliable sources become available. --Mark viking (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.