Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MECWA (2nd nomination)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 21:33, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

=[[MECWA]]=

AfDs for this article:
    {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MECWA}}

:{{la|MECWA}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MECWA (2nd nomination)}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|MECWA}})

Mostly unsourced, a lot seems to have been copy-pasted (note use of "our" and "we" multiple times throughout). Awards may establish some notability but only one seems to have a real source. Otherwise reads like an advert.  fetchcomms☛ 22:04, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete: Fails WP:ADVERT. Also, seems to much like it was written by the company or as an advert. -- /MWOAP|Notify Me\ 22:10, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete: Spam. Joe Chill (talk) 23:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 01:12, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - In addition to the obvious spam/advert issues, I'm also not finding any independent and reliable sources that indicate notability. PDCook (talk) 22:00, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

:*Comment - During the previous AfD additional sources were added, but I'm not so sure they demonstrate notability. Most are either affiliated with the organization or the government. [http://www.theage.com.au/news/hr-and-recruiting/teach-the-staff-to-stay/2006/08/18/1155408011247.html?page=2 This one] appears to be independent and reliable, however. Anymore like that? PDCook (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Comment - http://trove.nla.gov.au/result?q=mecwa - there is stuff out there - but hardly what I would call WP:RS SatuSuro 07:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete for absence of reliable third party sources. LibStar (talk) 06:43, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.