Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marc Gracie

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. KTC (talk) 07:54, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Marc Gracie]]=

:{{la|Marc Gracie}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Marc_Gracie Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Marc Gracie}})

Subject does not appear to satisfy WP:GNG or WP:CREATIVE Makro (talk) 18:20, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

::Is that considered a significant film award? --Bejnar (talk) 05:19, 5 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (yak) @ 20:38, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Rcsprinter123 (discuss) @ 20:38, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: Be warned that this editor has been making several bad faith AfDs in response to his own article's AfD. Cbrittain10 (talk|contribs) 17:08, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arfæst! 18:56, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|96%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  B E C K Y S A Y L E 02:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep - Available cites may be a little on the thin side, but mainly oppose because WP:POINTy is a misuse of this process. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Feel this person is worth an entry - he has 20 years experience in Aussie TV and has directed numerous features. Dutchy85 (talk) 13:09, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

  • Keep sufficient coverage and body of work for notability. Artw (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.