Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Esakoff

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to City_of_Glen_Eira#Past_and_current_Glen_Eira_councillors and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

=[[Margaret Esakoff]]=

:{{la|Margaret Esakoff}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Margaret Esakoff}})

fails WP:BIO and WP:POLITICIAN. being a mayor does not guarantee notability. coverage is merely about her making comments in the media, rather than coverage of her as an individual. [http://www.google.com.au/search?q=%22Margaret+Esakoff%22&hl=en&gl=au&tbm=nws&source=lnt&tbs=ar:1&sa=X&ei=O75ZTpPXLufkiALHrdmUCQ&ved=0CBIQpwUoBQ&biw=1024&bih=843&cad=cbv&sei=O75ZTpPXLufkiALHrdmUCQ] LibStar (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 14:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Grahame (talk) 02:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Delete. Agree with nom. Being a mayor does not satisfy WP:POLITICIAN and, although she gets a few hits in the gnews archive, I could find nothing that could be considered the significant coverage that is required to pass GNG. Jenks24 (talk) 09:10, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
Delete or Redirect to City of Glen Eira. Very little news coverage found about her. --MelanieN (talk) 21:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.