Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margo Rey (2nd nomination)

:{{la|Margo Rey}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Margo_Rey_(2nd_nomination) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Margo Rey}})

Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 August 22. Procedural nomination, I am neutral. T. Canens (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. Singer/songwriter with coverage in multiple WP:RS secondary sources including interesting educational biographic informative material. See for example ({{Find sources|Margo Rey}}), specifically 40 results in Google Books, another 24 results in Google News archives, etc. — Cirt (talk) 14:57, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

:*I think the totals you state are results for the keywords, though your stated 40 results is over optimistic when I click Big G from the UK. Some are results for other people with Margo Rey in the search. Others are mentions in passing, a drive by that does not qualify as a real reference for anything except that the person exists. I find insufficient material so far for me to take a positive stance in this discussion. Equally I find there is no reason at present for me to take a negative stance. I may yet be persuaded to either view. I am aware that Big G is not the final arbiter of notability. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 17:44, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

::*I am now persuaded. Keep as notable per Vertium, below; additions to the article do it for me. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. Notability for musicians is not achieved solely through references in newspapers and magazines. This article should be kept for the following reasons:

:*The artist is notable (per WP:MUSICBIO Criteria 2) in that three of her released songs on two albums have achieved a significant level on the Adult Contemporary (chart), a Billboard chart that has been in existence since 1961. Two songs were in the Top 20 of this chart and one peaked at position 21.

:*The [http://www.billboard.com/#/news/bubbling-under-marina-the-diamonds-shine-1007261152.story article] on her by independent Billboard Magazine (as a “Bubbling Under” artist) calls her charting “a notable achievement…, considering the format's almost exclusive reliance on multi-format hits released on major labels"

:*Has had her performances reviewed in reliable, non-self-published, independent works (meeting criteria of WP:MUSICBIO #1).

:*Per WP:ATD, if the page can be improved, this should be solved through regular editing, rather than deletion. There is foundational notability and enough independent WP:RS to support this article. If the article requires additional editing, I believe that’s the more appropriate route

:I have additional independent sources which I'm adding to the article now. Vertium ^{When all is said} _{and done} 18:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 19:27, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep. The combination of three charted songs, plus some decent (albeit not overwhelming) coverage in reliable sources - including Billboard magazine, Billboard.com, Las Vegas Sun, and CBS Radio - is enough in my view to satisfy WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG.  Gongshow ^Talk 07:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.