Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Max Amini
=[[Max Amini]]=
:{{la|Max Amini}} – (
:({{Find sources|Max Amini}})
Tagged for notability for 18 months, but concerns remain. I can't find the significant coverage we require - ImDb verifies a few bit parts, but in my opinion that doesn't put him over the threshold. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 07:19, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:35, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps someone might add citations found through the Find sources above. Some are short verifications while others are a bit more significant: [http://www.gazette.net/stories/06292010/montnew182553_32587.php Gazette], [http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/latimes/access/1201702441.html?dids=1201702441:1201702441&FMT=ABS&FMTS=ABS:FT&type=current&date=Jan+25%2C+2007&author=Mark+Sachs&pub=Los+Angeles+Times&desc=THE+ALTERNATIVES%3B+COMEDY%3B+'Sultans+of+Satire'+plans+to+lighten+things+up+a+bit%3B+Comedy+show+will+feature+performers+from+Middle+Eastern+cultures.&pqatl=google Los Angeles Times], [http://www.arabamericannews.com/news/index.php?mod=article&cat=Artamp;Culture&article=1115&page_order=1&act=print Arab American News], [http://www.lasvegascitylife.com/articles/2008/12/22/ae/picks/doc495013cf96377028398914.txt Citylife], [http://www.persianesquemagazine.com/2009/12/07/max-amini-on-showtime-bridging-the-gap-the-middle-east-comedy-talks/ Persianesque Magazine], [http://www.parstimes.com/comedy/max_amini/ Pars Times], [http://books.google.com/books?as_brr=0&as_pub=-icon&q=%22Max+Amini%22 some books], etc... Looks to be enough available to bring this article into line. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 07:35, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:11, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
- Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.