Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melbourne Model: The Musical
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:48, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Melbourne Model: The Musical]]=
:{{la|Melbourne Model: The Musical}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Melbourne Model: The Musical}})
Just a minor student satirical work around a specific issue that has no ongoing notability. Boneymau (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 23:40, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Theatre-related deletion discussions. Boneymau (talk) 23:41, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- Redirect to Melbourne Curriculum where this musical is already presented as part of the student response. There is some coverage at the time, but not after that I am able to find that would establish this as notable. -- Whpq (talk) 03:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 08:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG. doesn't deserve a redirect either as it really adds little value to the topic of Melbourne curriculum. LibStar (talk) 02:49, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete concur with LibStar that there is not enough sourcing to support a redirect.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 17:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - as my nomination.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.