Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michele O'Shea

:{{la|Michele O'Shea}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Michele O'Shea}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Michele O'Shea}})

Biography with no references and hardly any content at all   —Chris Capoccia ^T⁄_C 23:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

• Wait before voting The article had much more content until a few hours ago. The original author pulled back most of the material, and writes that more time is needed. Review the edit history before voting, please. Cullen328 (talk) 23:39, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
• I agree with the above. Yeah, let's just wait. Delete. There's no more edits. So delete since it's not gonna be fixed. Endofskull (talk) 23:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 00:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete. After looking at the present and previous versions of the article it is clear that notability is not likely to be satisfied. Xxanthippe (talk).
• Speedy delete, no claims of notability, at least there should have been a subst:prod blp added to it. Corvus cornix_talk 03:09, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
• I think this article should not be deleted. I just need some more time to verify all the data I have. For instance, the subject of the biography has had an important impact in the field of mental retardation perception in developing countries. Gonzalink (talk). —Preceding undated comment added 03:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC). — Gonzalink (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
• Delete Promising student. Not yet notable, per Xxan. Gscholar and Gnews turned up little. Ray^Talk 15:34, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete - Agree with RayAYang that this is a promising student, but does not currently meet our general notability guidelines, nor that for an academic. -- Whpq (talk) 16:04, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
• Delete. I think any disinterested ed will come to the same conclusion after reviewing the article history. The subject is basically a student who is a country mile from fulfilling any of the broad collection of possible notability criteria we have here. The original article was a CV, filled mostly with WP:OR. The current version is a gutted shell. This is an uncontroversial delete. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.