Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike D'Amato (politician)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. jāš›e deckertalk 03:36, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Mike D'Amato (politician)]]=

:{{la|Mike D'Amato (politician)}} ā€“ (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mike_D%27Amato_(politician) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Mike D'Amato (politician)}})

Does not meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. Some local coverage, but not enough to meet GNG. Boleyn (talk) 16:47, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. Subject does not meet WP:POLITICIAN. I won't cosider an assistant legislator notable enough to meet WP:POL. All I can see is a scanty reliable sources which does not satisfy the criteria.Wikicology (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
  • I certainly consider Milwaukee to be a large enough city that its city councillors could be considered notable enough for Wikipedia articles if you could write a genuinely substantive article that was sourced well enough to pass WP:GNG ā€” but it is not in the narrow range of cities for which city councillors get an automatic presumption of notability under WP:NPOL, and the sourcing here isn't even approaching the outer suburbs of the volume necessary to pass GNG. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:07, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per {{u|Bearcat}}. Nothing more to add. Bearian (talk) 13:05, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails notability for a politician as explained well by {{u|Bearcat}} above. --DoctorBob3 (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.