Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miko Kung Fu

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:12, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

=[[Miko Kung Fu]]=

:{{la|Miko Kung Fu}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miko_Kung_Fu Stats])

:({{Find sources|Miko Kung Fu}})

Non-notable small cluster of schools Peter Rehse (talk) 04:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 04:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete no evidence of notability. JJL (talk) 04:30, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - Google News US, Austria and Germany provided nothing substantial aside from [http://www.kampfkunst-board.info/forum/f98/miko-ving-tsun-92227/ one forum link], which, of course, would not be sufficient or reliable. There is no evidence to suggest this form of martial art is more notable than any other self-made system. SwisterTwister talk 19:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete There is nothing in the article to show this art is notable nor does the article have any independent sources. My search found nothing to support a claim of notability. Papaursa (talk) 03:19, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.