Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Milton mapes

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus - Liberatore(T) 20:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

=[[Milton mapes]]=

another non notable band Gator (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom.Gator (talk) 16:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep but move to correct capitalization. They are on AMG [http://www.allmusic.com/cg/amg.dll?P=amg&sql=Milton+Mapes&x=0&y=0&opt1=1&sourceid=mozilla-search] which confirms that they have 3 releases on 2 apparently notable labels. A cursory glance at the google results suggests verifiability ([http://www.austinchronicle.com/issues/dispatch/2003-03-14/music_feature8.html] etc.) --W.marsh 17:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep If it's on AMG, it's always notable enough for inclusion. That AMG review of their second album is a classic of AMG badness. Johnny Loftus is one of the all-time top 5 worst reviewers on that site, easily. Bobby P. Smith Sr. Jr. 18:06, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep They are a continually active, nationally touring band. What do they have to do to be a "notable" band? Bands are increasingly using small labels and doing more DIY promotion, and I think they are a great example of that process.

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.