Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini Viva

:{{la|Mini_Viva}} - (View AfD)(View log)

Why do you want to delete the article anyway?

--Laxstar5 (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:49, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

• Keep - Disregarding the lack of a valid rationale for deletion, they made the British top 10 last year with Left My Heart in Tokyo, thus passing Wp:BAND. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess)|(talk to me)|(What I've done) 14:19, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep. The article asserts notability, and the fact that the band had a charting single means that they pass our notability guidelines, as noted above. No objection to a speedy close for lack of rationale, either, but there's no reason not to have the debate now. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, according to WP:SK. There are zero remaining arguments for deletion and an emerging consensus claims that the band is able to pass WP:BAND. I really don't see why we should prolong this discussion. — Rankiri (talk) 15:41, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
• Speedy keep - no deletion rationale.--BelovedFreak 16:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep - Meets WP:BAND. PDCook (talk) 16:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
• Keep - Nominator's lack of reason is a procedural error: forgot to complete AfD Step 2. In any case, the group still meets WP:BAND as noted by everyone above. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.