Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Miss Trans Star Internacional

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. More like no discussion. No prejudice against speedy renomination  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:04, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

=[[Miss Trans Star Internacional]]=

:{{la|Miss Trans Star Internacional}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Miss_Trans_Star_Internacional Stats])

:({{Find sources|Miss Trans Star Internacional}})

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Cliff Smith 06:31, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

This came up on the CSD circuit, but I feel that there is just enough notability in the page that it should not be speedily axed, so here we are. I have no opinion on the article staying or going, I just feel that this should be given a chance to live. TomStar81 (Talk) 05:44, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:49, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 01:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Relisting comment - Nominator seems to have misspoken. It seems s/he meant "indication of importance" and not "notability". Note that the article was originally tagged for CSD. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. Can't find any evidence that it meets WP:GNG, no significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Jenks24 (talk) 07:42, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.