Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mohammed Nizamul Huq

:{{la|Mohammed Nizamul Huq}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Mohammed_Nizamul_Huq Stats])

:({{Find sources|Mohammed Nizamul Huq}})

Not even close to WP:NOTE Darkness Shines (talk) 23:25, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

• Keep: I, on the other hand, think that the biography of a supreme court justice who is currently swirling in scandal is of the utmost noteworthiness, so perhaps we need other opinions and discussion to back up those opinions. I look forward to it.Aminul802 (talk) 04:38, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
• Keep. Judge of a national supreme court. Of course he's notable. WP:POLITICIAN and WP:COMMONSENSE. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:50, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

:...and it's not just any old supreme court, but that of the eighth most populous country in the world. Not even close to failing WP:NOTE. Phil Bridger (talk) 16:39, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:51, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

• Keep per the above. Article already includes independent secondary sources. Lord Roem (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.