Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Montgomery Maxton

Vanity, non-notable Chuck 00:19, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete Vanity, not notable. Website listed has [http://www.alexa.com/data/details?url=MontgomeryMaxton.com no Alexa rank at all!] Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:25, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. The Google test yelded 11 results.
• Delete. Mentioned in a [http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2003/08/18/loc_wwwloc1a18.html The Enquirerer article] about gay marriage. Still, non-notable. —Tokek 00:49, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• weak keep at least for now; Google hits are not only evidence of notability. I'd give editors a chance to add reference to published works, critiques, and so on. I have no access to literary notability, but others surely do, and I'd give it a chance. DavidH 01:04, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
• The VfD process gives them 5 days, that's usually enough for someone to come along and fix it if it is fixable. -Splash 02:35, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No indicia of encyclopedic notability - "up and coming" doesn't quite cut it. -- BD2412 ^talk 01:14, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per User:BD2412/deletion debates 02:35, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Sorry -- looks like a nice website, though. The article will be welcomed back once he becomes a published poet. Pburka 03:07, August 4, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. NN, sounds more like a bio than anything. Karmafist 05:02, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity. Tempshill 05:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete because it looks like a vanity page. --Martey 11:30, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Vanity. EdwinHJ | Talk 23:35, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn, when the first google hit is the Deletion log... --Etacar11 23:51, 4 August 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.