Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morris Moore

:{{la|Morris Moore}} ([{{fullurl:Morris Moore|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morris Moore}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Obviously an admirable man, but I see no particular reason why he should have an article on Wikipedia. He wasn't the first African-American fireman in a major fire department or anything of that nature, which might qualify him for an article. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 15:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Does not appear to comply with WP:BIO — available info would support a eulogy, but apparently not an encylopædia article. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C16:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• DANGIT can't bring myself to say "delete" on this one because it's so well done. Give it time and let some sources come in? Editing? Assertion of notability? Please, I want to say keep!--Paul McDonald (talk) 19:38, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Comment H'mm. As far as I'm aware, compliance with WP:N and WP:V will usually save an article from deletion. I'm not aware of any policy that lets us keep articles that don't comply with WP:N just because they're nicely written. Can you point me at that policy? —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C20:40, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Answer Nope. Which is why I'm a "DANGIT" its probably going to get deleted. Maybe we could userfy to the primary article creator?--Paul McDonald (talk) 23:26, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• Well, yeah, I guess it could be userified, but…to what end? He'll still be non-notable, which means userification would seem to run afoul of WP:NOTHOST. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C00:05, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Personal feelings aside, he simply doesn't meet notability at this point. Niteshift36 (talk) 04:59, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't meet WP:BIO Nick-D (talk) 07:57, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delete - No sources provided or found to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 15:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.