Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali Sorcar

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:09, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Muhammad Ali Sorcar]]=

:{{la|Muhammad Ali Sorcar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Muhammad_Ali_Sorcar Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Muhammad Ali Sorcar}})

The article's single source is his CV. Ambassadors have no presumption of notability under WP:NPOL (see also WP:POLOUTCOMES). Searches of the usual Google types, including by Bengali name ("মোহাম্মদ আলী সরকার") , found echoes of a government press release each time he's moved to a new position or presents his credentials,[https://www.thedailystar.net/news-detail-146435][https://www.thedailystar.net/news/muhammad-ali-sorcar-new-envoy-to-germany][https://bdnews24.com/bangladesh/2016/09/27/bangladesh-changes-ambassadors-in-three-countries][https://www.mzv.sk/web/en/news/current_issues/-/asset_publisher/lrJ2tDuQdEKp/content/javorcik-receives-the-ambassador-of-bangladesh-as-credentials-are-presented/10182] and a smattering of "also present at the function" passing mentions, but no in-depth, independent, secondary sources. Not notable. Worldbruce (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 18:10, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Keep I added 2 reliable sources and subject meets WP:POLOUTCOMES. Also His bio is on Wikipedia in two other languages which are not his native language.Fatzaof (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

::Neither of the added sources (an embassy web page and a photo) is independent of him, so neither helps establish notability. The existence of an article on a language version of Wikipedia doesn't mean it meets that language version's policies and guidelines. It may only mean that no one has gotten around to deleting it yet. Furthermore, each language version of Wikipedia operates according to its own policies and guidelines, set by those who edit there, so whether a biography of him exists on other Wikipedias is irrelevant to the question of whether it should exist here. Which of the 11 bullet points of WP:POLOUTCOMES does he meet, and how? --Worldbruce (talk) 14:41, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti ^{*Let's talk!*} 11:16, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Delete Per WP:POLOUTCOMES: Ambassadors are not considered inherently notable. Ben Ben ^(talk) 16:51, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.