Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:58, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.}}

:{{la|Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.}} ([{{fullurl:Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Munsch Hardt Kopf & Harr P.C.}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

This does not have any real assertion of notability and is much too promotional in tone. It was written by one "User:RightFirmRightNow" who appears to be a COI. Triplestop x3 02:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Delete advertising. One could also argue this as an A7 speedy. I really don't see any assertion of notability. Reso lute 02:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Definitely advertising spam. Dancing is Forbidden (talk) 06:25, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete as per above. Bobak (talk) 06:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.