Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nathalie von Bismarck

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Nathalie von Bismarck}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Talk:Nathalie_von_Bismarck Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nathalie von Bismarck}})

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2020 June 6. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:59, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

• Substitute nomination. I have been in contact with {{u|Khaoz555}}, who initially nominated this page for deletion. I have removed their original nomination due to...let's just say serious flaws that ran afoul of more than one WP policy. In discussion with them, I presented this observation: the article fails to demonstrate that the subject is a notable individual beyond her former marriage, and notability is neither inherited nor automatically married into. I offer that point here as the rationale for considering deletion of this article. —C.Fred (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

::I approve of this new nomination. - Khaoz555 (talk) 19:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:38, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 20:39, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete as per nom. Ibn Daud (talk) 21:25, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:43, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

• Delete: Per Nom's accurate rationale. -- Otr500 (talk) 00:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.