Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Natural Winter Solstice Alignment Cave in Manchester, Kentucky

:{{la|Natural Winter Solstice Alignment Cave in Manchester, Kentucky}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Natural_Winter_Solstice_Alignment_Cave_in_Manchester,_Kentucky Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Natural Winter Solstice Alignment Cave in Manchester, Kentucky}})

Fails general notability guideline; no significant coverage in reliable sources. Drm310 (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Delete - simply fringe, no coverage in RS, COI obviously. I see claims about more Old World alphabets on the FB page - related to [http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/America/United_States/Kentucky/Clay/Manchester/Marked_Rock/3.html]. Love the claim that a circle supposedly found on that stone is the symbol of Ra. Dougweller (talk) 17:02, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

• almost a speedy delete no reliable sources, only source provided is Facebook link. LibStar (talk) 17:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

• Delete on the basis of dubious coherence of the article in its current form and lack of notability. I looked at the, um, article, and most of our mini-stubs are both more intelligible and more substantive than this one. John Carter (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. [http://ancientamerica.com/caves-and-the-winter-solstice/ Self-promotional] nonsense. Hensley et al should have used [http://issuu.com/claycountychronicle/docs/clay_county_chronicle_3-2-14 this article] for the barest fig-leaf of sourcing. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:45, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Doesn't really explain what it is, fails GNG, no reliable sources. --AmaryllisGardener ^talk 18:24, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
• Delete Lacks reliable sources; classic example of fringe archaeoastronomy. SteveMcCluskey (talk) 19:25, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
• Delete I couldn't find any reliable sources for this, the existing sources are Facebook the links for which should be removed. I will do some further research and if I turn up any sources I will post them. - - MrBill3 (talk) 06:14, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. SteveMcCluskey (talk) 18:49, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

• Delete as WP:FRINGE lacking WP:RS. -- 120.23.185.71 (talk) 22:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
• Comment. I'm particularly amused by the claim of "Cherokee Indian Syllabary engraved," given that this script was only invented in the 1820s. -- 120.23.185.71 (talk) 22:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.