Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neanderthal theory of autism

Page appears to be original research or original thought, and may have poor verifyablity or possibly have bias. Bovineone 21:45, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

• Appears to fall under original research. Lots of cites but with considerable liberty taken in concluding, mostly toward the genetic superiority of Asperger's sufferers. An exact paste of [http://www.rdos.net/eng/asperger.htm]. --Lucent 21:52, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
• Copyvio and tagged. --malathion ^talk 22:03, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

• Can a user violate his own copyright? The original submitter and the content's domain match. It appears he was submitting his own research. --Lucent 22:12, July 30, 2005 (UTC)
• We still need to be careful, since the poster may not have authority to grant the copyleft. I assume that an article that is blanked for copyvio becomes a speedy deleteRobert A West 00:02, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete as original research. Nandesuka 22:27, 30 July 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.