Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neeraj Malviya

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete and redirect to Charu Asopa#Personal life. Randykitty (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

=[[:Neeraj Malviya]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Neeraj Malviya}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Neeraj Malviya}})

Fails WP:GNG and lack of reliable sources. Preetykaur761 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Keep She has significant news coverage if you search google and it would seem she is a popular actress in Bollywood. I have added a few new sources to the article. Meets WP:ENT. Peter303x (talk) 23:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

:Peter303x the person you have added sources to are about Charu Asopa. This is an actor Neeraj who dated her and fails notability tag and gng. It’s a he. Preetykaur761

:: Oh I see what happened, I got something confused. I have corrected it, but all the sources are still good and if you search Google news, there are tons of other news about the subject. Peter303x (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

::: Yes but its still fails gng as he is not a notable actor only doing few shows doesn’t make him notable it fails WP:NACTOR and GNG. Also adding unreliable sources don’t count. There are lack of reliable sources which fails GNG.

::::And Peter303x the sources are not good Bollywood Life Tellychakkar and Bollywood Shaadi is not reliable sources per WP:ICTFSOURCES so no it fails notability and GNG Preetykaur761 (talk) 11:28, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

::::: I see "Bollywood Life" on the list, but not "Bollywood Shaadi," but the main reason I voted keep is that this person is in many Indian publications, so that would mean they are very notable in India. He is also in India Today [https://www.indiatoday.in/television/celebrity/story/mere-angne-mein-actress-charu-asopa-on-bitter-break-up-with-neeraj-malviya-i-was-on-anti-anxiety-pills-1441609-2019-01-29], which is considered reliable. Peter303x (talk) 09:13, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Being in the news several years ago does not make him notable. And also the page only has two reliable sources and search there are not more than two. So it’s better to delete because he lacks gng — Preceding unsigned comment added by Preetykaur761 (talkcontribs) 22:22, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails GNG and I do not see anything that helps it to meet WP:NACTOR. ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Charu Asopa#Personal life as that's what he seems to be known for. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:SIGCOV.4meter4 (talk) 22:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete, as per The Aafī. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:45, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete for lack of notability, many sources focus on his spouse, with him as a passing mention. This is insufficient and nothing in NACTOR saves it from this conclusion, as his roles in the linked articles are fleeting and do not appear to be significant. Local Variable (talk) 05:43, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.