Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Daly Clark

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Nicholas Daly Clark]]=

:{{la|Nicholas Daly Clark}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Daly Clark}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Nicholas Daly Clark}})

First prod removed by creator, who also created Vicariously, the web series by Clark, and hasn't touched any non-Clark related articles. No reliable sources given or found to establish notability of an individual. Clark certainly exists, but walk-on roles and a web series aren't sufficient to meet WP:NACTOR. tedder (talk) 03:32, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete Same as the related nomination just above this one, he does not come close to meeting WP:GNG, based on the sources that are cited. First Light (talk) 05:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete as article fails notability criteria for actors. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 05:54, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete Someone needs an ego trip SpikeTheSpider (talk) 08:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:15, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete for now per WP:TOOSOON. Let the writer/actor get more under his belt and get some coverage... then we might consider a return. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:41, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.