Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Piedmont
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Nick Piedmont}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nick Piedmont}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Nick Piedmont}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 12:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
=[[:Nick Piedmont]]=
:{{la|1=Nick Piedmont}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Nick Piedmont}})
Fails WP:GNG. Only database sources are provided for the article, nothing that shows subject passes GNG. Search results show some coverage, but not enough to satisfy GNG. ♡RAFAEL♡(talk) 10:42, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Martial arts, and California. Shellwood (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.