Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolaos Xenakis

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  09:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

=[[Nikolaos Xexakis]]=

:{{la|Nikolaos Xexakis}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nikolaos_Xenakis Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Nikolaos Xexakis}})

I'm questioning whether he meets WP:PROF and WP:GNG. I wasn't able to find the required sources needed to cure the "additional citations needed" tag that's been there for six years. -- Tavix (talk) 04:13, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

:Weak Delete. A theological advisor to the Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church[http://www.ecclesia.gr/English/holysynod/committees/dogma/dogmatics.htm], who wrote a three volume dogmatic theology[https://davidheithstade.wordpress.com/2014/07/02/greek-textbooks-and-handbooks-on-orthodox-dogmatic-theology/][http://www.protoporia.gr/orthodoxos-dogmatiki-i-p-289397.html], I think he's probably notable, but there's a paucity of sources in English for verifiability and even in Greek from a Google search on his name in Greek.--Samuel J. Howard (talk) 15:10, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Samuel J. Howard (talk) 17:41, 2 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete per nominator. User:Samuel J. Howard added some useful information, but that information isn't enough to get the subject past WP:PROF. For what it's worth, I don't think the subject has an article on the Greek Wikipedia either (I looked [https://el.wikipedia.org/wiki/%CE%9E%CE%B5%CE%BD%CE%AC%CE%BA%CE%B7%CF%82 here]). NewYorkActuary (talk) 22:35, 2 October 2015 (UTC)
  • Oppose deletion. It is not surprising that so little is turning up as the eminent professor about whom I initiated the entry is called Xexakis, not Xenakis as wrongly put in the title and in the above discussion____Clive Sweeting3October2015

:*I get ~500 Google hits searching both ways, so I don't think the title is the problem here. If you could provide sources, that'd be the most helpful thing to do to advance your cause. -- Tavix (talk) 14:27, 3 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete for lack of significant coverage. Νικόλαος Ξεξάκης must have led a quiet life in writing the three volumes of Orthodox dogma. I didn't even find a review of the books. According to documents on Google scholar he has sat on numerous thesis examination committees, so his professorial status is verifiable. Note:The article was moved from Nikolaos Xexakis to Nikolaos Xenakis on 4 August 2013‎ by editor Ntetos. --Bejnar (talk) 02:12, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Can we get the correct name restored so that a proper discussion may ensue---7October2015Clive Sweeting

:Does the subject have an article on the Greek Wikipedia using the other spelling? NewYorkActuary (talk) 18:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC) Never mind, I went and checked myself. Using the spelling offered by User:Bejnar, there is no article on the Greek Wikipedia. But the name does seems to appear in some references in other articles. NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:50, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as an unreferenced BLP. We shouldn't be even having this discussion - this article should have been deleted as an unreferenced BLP long ago. I don't know why there is an "additional citations needed" tag - there aren't any citations. StAnselm (talk) 20:17, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.