Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Pacific 3617

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:46, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

=[[:Northern Pacific 3617]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Northern Pacific 3617}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Northern_Pacific_3617 Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Northern Pacific 3617}})

Page relies on few sources, this engine also has no historical significance CZ3699 (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. CptViraj (📧) 07:54, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep for the same reasons as when I de-PRODed this: Locomotive is in the collection of a respected museum; the type of locomotive is about 50 years old, and few unmodified examples are still in service; the article has existed for over 4 years; and has been assessed as C-class. Note that the EMD SD45 only list 7 out of 1260 as preserved – that's 0.55%. I have also added a reference. — Iain Bell (talk) 15:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

:: Well respected museum is just a opinion, so that isn’t really a good reason to keep this article. Also the preservation section doesn’t count for engines still in service (still plenty.) Also just because the article has been on wiki for 4 years doesn’t mean it’s automatically good CZ3699 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 16:21, 29 February 2020 (UTC)

  • Keep The article has adequate sourcing for its size, including an additional one I found [https://trn.trains.com/news/news-wire/2019/02/07-duluth-museum-to-return-northern-pacific-sd45-to-operation]. It also had been featured in a museum just as Bell said. I do not see any policy that this article is violated. Also, per WP:OTHER, check out :Category:Individual locomotives of the United States. AmericanAir88(talk) 01:42, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.