Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Odhrán Allen

=[[Odhrán Allen]]=

:{{la|Odhrán Allen}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Odhrán Allen}})

Insufficient evidence of notability. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:58, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

  • I am the primary author of the article on Odhrán Allen. He is an important figure in the contemporary Irish gay rights movement and within that sector and in the wider gay rights field in Europe, he is considered an expert on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) mental health. I have yet to add these details to the article, as I am trying to source appropriate references. Keep Spectrumfive (talk) 02:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

:*This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 17:39, 9 December 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete. WP:GNG looks like the most relevant standard for this case, but I'm not seeing the nontrivial coverage in multiple reliable sources that would be needed to pass. The story in The Independent is the only source that looks independent (heh) and reliable, but he is mentioned only trivially there, and that's only one source. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:54, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete. Can't find anything in GS. General notability seems weak. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2010 (UTC).
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Snappy (talk) 17:44, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Absolutely no evidence that he is "important figure in the contemporary Irish gay rights movement". Smacks of a vanity piece. Snappy (talk) 17:46, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.