Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One World Children's Fund

=[[One World Children's Fund]]=

:{{la|One World Children's Fund}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One World Children's Fund}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|One World Children's Fund}})

Sources used are either not reliable sources, do not actually mention this organization, or are the groups own website. Search failed to find anything any better, attempt to communicate with page author resulted in the creation of a POV pushing sock puppet. Seems like this group is trying to force their way onto Wikipedia whether or not there is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to warrant an article. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Delete for all the grand claims in the article, the sourcing is abysmal, which is surprising as the media loves to cover charities. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:56, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Delete Per WP:NOBILITY --Confession0791 (talk) 01:52, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:59, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Weak delete The sources in the article do not establish notability, but there is a hint [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-press+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22One+World+Children%27s+Fund%22 here] of significant articles about the charity in the San Jose Mercury-News and the San Mateo Times; unfortunately they are behind paywalls. Bottom line, I think there might be coverage out there, but I couldn't find it. --MelanieN (talk) 01:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.