Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ontology and methodology of evolutionary alternatives

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. -R. fiend 15:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

=[[Ontology and methodology of evolutionary alternatives]]=

Reason why the page should be deleted FuelWagon 19:42, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

delete -I started this article recently, and it was immediately entered under a VFD with "no consensus". I've since moved all the interesting content to Methodological naturalism and put it into narative format. This page is now redundant and any article that links to this article would be much better off linking ot Methodological naturalism. FuelWagon 19:45, 30 August 2005 (UTC)

delete, Fine, poster knows best. -- Ec5618 19:51, August 30, 2005 (UTC)
delete, these issues are best dealt with in more specific articles. --Ian Pitchford 20:04, 30 August 2005 (UTC)
delete as per nomination, and good job on the restructuring. Alai 06:03, 4 September 2005 (UTC)

This is the second time this article has been nominated for deletion:

Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Ontology and methodology of evolutionary alternatives
This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. No opinion. —Cryptic (talk) 04:23, 6 October 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Dottore So 06:41, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
delete, poster knows best. Shouldn't someone have deleted this by now?-- Ec5618 19:51, August 30, 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.