Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Optimal classification

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The deletion argument was that this is original research when the article title is used to describe an algorithm, and that the references do not support the notability of the subject. Despite the verbose nature of the opposing comment, these arguments were not clearly refuted. The use of socks to give the appearance of greater support is also extremely problematic, and I have counted those opinions as being from User:Julie Dancer. Kevin (talk) 23:42, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

=[[Optimal classification]]=

class="messagebox"

| This page has been blanked as a courtesy. {{#ifeq:|yes|The Arbitration Committee's decision is still in effect, and can be found in the [{{fullurl:Wikipedia:{{PAGENAME}}|action=history}} page history].}}

Blanked because of numerous personal attacks during the debate. See [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Optimal_classification&oldid=228499092 this version] for the discussion. Kevin (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.