Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ove-Naxx

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:47, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

=[[Ove-Naxx]]=

:{{la|Ove-Naxx}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ove-Naxx Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Ove-Naxx}})

The topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources (?) enough to build a full article. No articles in major music news sources. No suitable merge targets. Please ping me if more (non-English and offline) sources are found. – czar 02:30, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 02:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Delete. No third-party sourcing or in-depth coverage. The article probably qualifies for speedy deletion, since no assertion of notability is made. --DAJF (talk) 07:16, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 10:58, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Delete - no reliable sources given or found to support notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:35, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.