Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacem in terris (with Philip Hacket

I want this to be a speedy, but it isn't. I'm not quite sure exactly what it is, but it certainly doesn't seem encyclopedic. smoddy 13:05, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. Agreed, a selection of poems are not encyclopedic. Thue | talk 13:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• So that's what it is... smoddy 13:37, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• I know the feeling :). Thue | talk 13:45, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• So it might also be a copyright violation. Koffieyahoo 13:42, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Possibly, not that it matters if it gets deleted through vfd. Thue | talk 13:45, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete This is a collection of translated poems. Neither the poems nor the translator show up via google (though that's not shocking). If cited, sourced and cleaned up it might be a candidate for transwiking to wikibooks, but otherwise it's non-encyclopedic so nuke it. -Harmil 13:53, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Published works by a named author such as this go on Wikisource (in Wikisource:Wikisource:Authors), not Wikibooks, and even then only if they are GFDL or public domain. These are not. This is the third instance where {{user|193.95.102.137}} has submitted an entire work by Youssef Rzouga as an encyclopaedia article. Two hells in the heart is currently tagged as a copyright violation. Poetic Works was deleted for being a copyright violation. This (and Pacem in terris) should be, also. Copyvio. Uncle G 17:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. A speedy would be fine with me. -R. fiend 14:50, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio/non-encyclopedic. --Ragib 02:23, 21 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete copyvio. JamesBurns 08:06, 21 July 2005 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.