Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papa Hades (Character)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:53, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

=[[Papa Hades (Character)]]=

:{{la|Papa Hades (Character)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Papa Hades (Character)}})

I nominate Papa Hades (Character) for deletion. It suffers from chronic fancruft; it also lacks or has minimal references to reliable third party sources and fails to adequately show the notability of the subject. Many films of similar notability do not have pages about individual characters, such as Anaconda. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:34, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:12, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete - Page has little content, and the character doesn't seem to be notable. The first source does not even mention him, and I can't get the second source to open. _Blake ^{(Talk·Edits)} 18:15, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Delete. As mentioned, article sources are inadequate and Googling doesn't show any real-world notability, at least not enough to pass our notability requirements for fictional characters. --NellieBly (talk) 03:07, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable fictional character who does not meet the general notability guideline. The article is a plot-only description of a fictional work without real-world perspective. The subject does not seem to be covered in reliable third-party sources to presume notability, so I do not see a valid reason to keep the article. Jfgslo (talk) 03:44, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
Delete fictional character article that's all plot description, when Wikipedia is WP:NOTJUSTPLOT. Needs reception and significance. Shooterwalker (talk) 15:12, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.