Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phitsanulok City F.C.

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Phitsanulok City F.C.}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Phitsanulok_City_F.C. Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Phitsanulok City F.C.}})

fails projet criteria in WP:FOOTYN and WP:GNG and WP:NORG Dom from Paris (talk) 22:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 22:24, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 23:18, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

• Delete - amateur club that has never played in the national cup, fails GNG and NFOOTY. 21.colinthompson (talk) 15:42, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
• Delete as stated above, fails too many criteria. Govvy (talk) 21:05, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
• Comment how substantial is the mention in the Thai fourfourtwo article? SportingFlyer talk 23:26, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
• It's three paragraphs introducing the team and their origins, from an overview piece profiling 17 Amateur League teams from the lower Northern Region. The coverage by ThaiLive.net[http://www.thailive.net/2018/08/09/%E0%B8%99%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%A2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C-%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%A9%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%B8%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%81%E0%B8%8B%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%95%E0%B8%B5%E0%B9%89/][http://www.thailive.net/2018/08/31/%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B6%E0%B8%81-%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%84%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%8A%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9A%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%A1-%E0%B8%A5%E0%B8%B1%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%99/] is more in-depth, but I have no idea who they are. The site doesn't list any publisher or editorial info, so probably can't be considered a reliable source. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - no evidence of notability, fails WP:GNG. GiantSnowman 14:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
• Delete - Per norm. Notability guidelines is not satisfied. ShunDream (talk) 19:54, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.