Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phoebe Allen's Hummingbird Webcam (2nd nomination)

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Phoebe Allen's Hummingbird Webcam}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Phoebe Allen's Hummingbird Webcam}})

Is this notable? No sources provided that note status of website since 2014 Plantdrew (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Biology and Organisms. Plantdrew (talk) 02:54, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

• Delete other than the Huffington Post fluffy piece, I came up empty in searching. Even if Phoebe were notable, she's dead by now, bless her heart.

:--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:26, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

• Comment: The previous AfD actually lists a surprising number of puff piecelets, mostly dead links now. Eh :/ --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 05:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
• Delete. As Elmidae said, a lot of puff pieces. It looks like the last AfD made the mistake of equating sources existing with WP:GNG. That isn't WP:SIGCOV even when an entire article in a source is focused on the subject. That's more in the human interest story side of newspapers that's much more WP:INDISCRIMINATE that serious lasting impact and [WP:SUSTAINED]] coverage. We are WP:NOTNEWSPAPER where this belongs instead. KoA (talk) 20:53, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
• Delete per above. AryKun (talk) 06:44, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
• Delete - no lasting coverage or notability. --SilverTiger12 (talk) 03:44, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.