Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pip's Three-Handed Chess

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Flowerparty^☀ 00:27, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Pip's Three-Handed Chess]]=

AfDs for this article:

{{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pip's Three-Handed Chess}}

:{{la|Pip's Three-Handed Chess}} ([{{fullurl:Pip's Three-Handed Chess|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pip's Three-Handed Chess}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

No google hits except one wikipedia mirror. Probably a hoax, although not a "blatant" hoax as for all I know it appears in a book about chess variations. As it stands though, (if not a hoax) it's unverifiable and as far as I can tell, unnotable. Beloved Freak 20:06, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

:Delete per WP:MADEUP. COI author, no sources, and doesn't make much sense chess-wise, either: it is not clear in which direction the pawns move (e.g the black ones: to the right? Then Black is a rook down after 1.b3 and 2.Bxb4), "White" (i.e. the party with Ke1) has an enormous advantage over both other parties, and the checkmate rules are inconsistent.--Pgallert (talk) 10:04, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Non-notable at best, very likely something that was just made up. Edward321 (talk)
Thanks for the comments. I wrote to User:Belovedfreak that this is not a hoax (I created the game). I can attest that it is a legitimate chess variant, though admittedly unknown and with some flaws.--Pip72 (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete - Per Pgallert and Edward. Also, the user above admits to creating the game so it also has a conflict of interest. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 20:07, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.