Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piwo Fellowship

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as a hoax or unverifable. Bearian (talk) 22:27, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

=[[Piwo Fellowship]]=

:{{la|Piwo Fellowship}} ([{{fullurl:Piwo Fellowship|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piwo Fellowship}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

  • Hoax student drinking club. Google had [http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=%22piwo+fellowship%22&hl=en never heard of it]. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 11:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as organization with no claim to notability, and block article creator whose name resembles the article title. The cited sources do not even mention this organization. This is one of those articles about "secret" organizations we used to see a lot of at AfD, but less so in recent times. If the organization is so secret that the article has to cite rumors, the organization is probably not verifiable. Article creators shouldn't try to have it both ways -- if you want to promote an organization, you can't write an article saying that little is known about it. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 14:22, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep As a student of the university sited in the article, there is some credence to their claim of notability. I have seen first hand accounts of their presence and read articles in the university newspaper, though am very keen to find more reliable (and cross-checkable!) references or even rumours. But as to their notability and notoriety, this fact is true. I will attempt to source more information on this. Matanakab 00:05, 24 July 2008 — Matanakab (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Comment: The above edit is likely a sockpuppet or meatpuppet. No other edits beyond this discussion. Speedy delete as hoax. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 14:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as it was previously. Fails WP:N and WP:V and is also an obvious hoax. TrulyBlue (talk) 15:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Cheers! -- 16:11, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete - 99% chance this is a silly hoax, 1% chance it exists but is so secret there's no information and it's not notable. Either way, delete. JohnCD (talk) 16:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as probable hoax. Given that it is so secret that reliable sources can't be found, it could also be deleted as unverifiable. -- Mattinbgn\talk 02:55, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Student prank. --Lester 04:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Well known amongst students of the university but Im unsure how to verify this? Mentioned in Newspaper and through Stein club mail. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.43.227.18 (talk • contribs)
  • Definitely Keep very well known group at Adelaide uni with locally significant social implications. Verifiable in On Dit -- 05:27, 24 July 2008 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.127.28.4 (talk • contribs) — 129.127.28.4 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete as prank/hoax.--Boffob (talk) 05:14, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: The sock drawer seems to be emptying as I'd suspected it would. I maintain my speedy delete vote and move this be closed under WP:SNOW if possible. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 06:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. Unreferenced nonsense. WWGB (talk) 11:23, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as complete bollocks (not from viewing the article but as an ex Adelaide Uni Student) - Peripitus (Talk) 11:52, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete This article is conspicuously lacking citations to support its many claims. The organisation does not meet the primary criterion specified in WP:ORG. Dolphin51 (talk) 03:05, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete, either it's a silly hoax or a secret society with no information available on it (and therefore fails WP:V). Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:45, 25 July 2008 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.