Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poor man's R

:{{la|Poor man's R}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Poor man's R}})

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide on car customisation. This is train-spotter stuff that belongs on Wikia, not in a global encyclopaedia Biker Biker (talk) 18:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:30, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

• Delete, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a how-to manual on cars or anything else. Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

• marginal. but leaning delete There are enough web hits out there to establish that the terms are used, but I doubt it would be possible to summon up reliable sources about the performance claims (for starters). Mangoe (talk) 19:31, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:19, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

---

• Delete - Per nom. Monterey Bay (talk) 01:42, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
• Question What does this have to do with railfanning? Nyttend (talk) 01:54, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.