Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Processed World (magazine)

:{{la|Processed World (magazine)}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Processed_World_(magazine) Stats])

:({{Find sources|Processed World (magazine)}})

Magazine last published in 2005. Cannot find mention in independent sources. Did include work from notable artists. Wkharrisjr (talk) 20:16, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep -- A popular anarchist magazine widely read throughout the San Francisco Bay Area and other parts of the United States. It featured many notable authors and artists. Keraunos (talk) 00:43, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

• Weak delete Though I see the merit in keeping this article, to meet Wikipedia's source requirements, this page will need to be completely re-sourced with independent sources.--Riverrunner123 (talk) 03:33, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep - Meets WP:GNG:

:* {{cite news |page= M11|newspaper= Globe and Mail |date=December 8, 1984 |section = City Living|title=Anti-computer rebels 'byte' back |author= Laura Fraser|url= |no-tracking=yes}}

:* {{cite journal |page= 246|journal = The Nation |date=March 1, 1986 |volume =242 |title= The high cost of high tech; the dark side of the chip.|author=John Wallace |accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url= http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-4152752.html}}

:* {{cite news |page= 1|newspaper= Los Angeles Times |date=December 3, 1986 |section = VW-View-LS-Life & Style|title= The 'Far Out' Utne Reader Digests Alternative Press|author= Frank Clancy|accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url= http://articles.latimes.com/1986-12-03/news/vw-437_1_eric-utne|no-tracking=yes}}

:* {{cite news |page= D14|newspaper= San Francisco Examiner |date=July 14, 1991|section = Business|title=10 Years Of A Wonderfully Bad Attitude Computers & Technology |author= Denise Caruso|accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url=http://www.caruso.com/work/index-sf-examiner/sf-examiner-1991/10-years-of-a-wonderfully-bad-attitude/ |no-tracking=yes}}

:* {{cite news |page=4 |newspaper= Los Angeles Times |date=March 24, 1997 |section = Business|title=Cyberculture. The Cd-Rom By The Bay |author=Paolo Pontoniere |accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url=http://articles.latimes.com/1997-03-24/business/fi-41664_1_san-francisco-history |no-tracking=yes}}

:* {{cite news |page=B3 |newspaper= San Francisco Chronicle |date= January 20, 1998|section =Business |title=Activist Looks At S.F.'S Fabled Past "Shaping San Francisco" Is A Cd-Rom With A Purpose |author= Jamie Beckett|accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url=http://www.sfgate.com/business/article/Activist-Looks-At-S-F-s-Fabled-Past-Shaping-3016114.php |no-tracking=yes}}

:* {{cite news |page= |newspaper= The Guardian |date=July 22, 2006 |section =Money |title= Idle thoughts|author= Tom Hodgkinson|accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2006/jul/22/careers.work7|no-tracking=yes}}

:* {{cite journal |page= 152|journal = New Labor Forum |date=October 1, 2007 |volume =16|issue=3/4 |title= Zines From The Shop Floor|author=Amanda Plumb |accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url= http://direct.bl.uk/bld/PlaceOrder.do?UIN=220555263&ETOC=RN&from=searchengine|doi = 10.1080/10957960701279272 }}

:* {{cite journal |page= 42|journal = Minnesota Monthly |date=March 1, 2012 |volume =46|issue=3|title= Utne Bids Adieu|author=Gregory J. Scott |accessdate=September 16, 2012 |url= http://www.minnesotamonthly.com/media/Minnesota-Monthly/March-2012/Utne-Bids-Adieu/index.php?cparticle=2&siarticle=1}}

:-- Uzma Gamal (talk) 01:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

• Keep per spread of references above. Also found on Highbeam (sub reqd): [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1207807.html Washington Post 1989], [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-4183864.html Chicago Sun Times 1993], [http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-99818450.html The Progressive 2003]. AllyD (talk) 18:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.