Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulla Reddy Sweets

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The consensus is to keep and the concerns regarding sourcing have been addressed. (non-admin closure) Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:49, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

=[[Pulla Reddy Sweets]]=

:{{la|Pulla Reddy Sweets}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pulla_Reddy_Sweets Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Pulla Reddy Sweets}})

Article about a non notable shop. No significant third party coverage at all. Totally unsourced. Doesn't pass our general notability threshold. T I can also see the use of peacock terms in the lead but that can fixed. Here the problem is notability. Jim Carter 20:11, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jim Carter 20:12, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:42, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:43, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep: This is very old and popular in the state of Andhra Pradesh. we may not get web sources for everything. Kindly don't delete. • Varma

::{{ping|Varmapak}} you will need to use the references in the article and put verifiable content that will help towards establishing notability of the subject. --AmritasyaPutraT 19:16, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep Probably it is notable. I have added four online reference on the article talk page, {{ping|Varmapak}} can you evaluate those references and, if suitable, use for the article? --AmritasyaPutraT 15:40, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

::{{Ping|AmritasyaPutra}} The provided sources are not inline. Jim Carter 12:57, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

::: {{ping|Jim Cartar}} yes Jim, I deliberately left them on talk page and requested Varmapak to evaluate their merit and use in the article. S/he has more than 1k edits so I am assuming s/he is aware of referencing. The logo says since 1948 and I could find several stray mention in newspapers of which I gave four direct mentions in national dailies. It may be notable. --AmritasyaPutraT 17:32, 8 November 2014 (UTC)


:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:54, 9 November 2014 (UTC)


::: {{ping|Jim Cartar}} Pulla Reddy Sweets is notable, you can also find same article in Telugu Language was created in the year 2007.- varma (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - AmritasyaPutra found splendid sources! Kautilya3 (talk) 22:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.