Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R&R Group

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[R&R Group]]=

:{{la|R&R Group}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/R%26R_Group Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|R&R Group}})

No evidence of notability in the article or on the web. Previously PRODded and declined without a reason. The creator said in an edit summary that he or she was "providing information on my Company", so there is an apparent conflict of interest there as well. — This, that and the other (talk) 05:26, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete - the article doesn't even have references and it is written like an advertisement. A search doesn't churn out any coverage by realiable sources either. The listing of the non-notable subsidiaries compounds the reasons as to why this should be deleted if not speedy. Kansiime (talk) 06:55, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:26, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete. No refs in the article. Author should provide some refs and evidence of notability. I read their home website and it is hard to glean any info about their notability from it. Szzuk (talk) 15:06, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Delete as this is nearly even speedy material with nothing else to suggest compromise improvement. Notifying tagger {{U|Qwertyus}}. 23:38, 9 January 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SwisterTwister (talk • contribs) 23:38, 9 January 2016‎

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.