Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rana Muhammad Akram Khan

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:20, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Rana Muhammad Akram Khan]]=

:{{la|Rana Muhammad Akram Khan}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Rana Muhammad Akram Khan}})

An article on a functionary of the Punjab Bar Council, no independent sources. {{userlinks|Sherry334}} and {{userlinks|Rajput334}} have created a series of articles on functionaries within the Punjab Bar Council, suggesting WP:COI, but the main issue here is lack of reliable independent sources or any objective claim to notability. Guy (Help!) 15:35, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:08, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Delete - I can find mentions of him ([http://app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=128056&Itemid=2], [http://tribune.com.pk/story/58116/lawyers-to-boycott-courts-today/]) but not significant coverage about him. The article asserts he ran for political office but makes not mention of him being elected nor did I find any evidence of that either. Fails both the general notability guidelines, and politician notability guidelines. -- Whpq (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete: Extensive lack of reliable source. Language is absurd; what kind of phrase is -He is also Known as a Punjabi Hero of International Karachi University. Bill william compton (talk) 16:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Comment - I wouldn't read too much into the language. It's likely written by somebody who is not a native English speaker, and there are cultural contexts that are lost when translating. -- Whpq (talk) 16:42, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.