Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhyme Skool with Katrina Kaif

:{{la|Rhyme Skool with Katrina Kaif}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rhyme_Skool_with_Katrina_Kaif Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rhyme Skool with Katrina Kaif}})

The article was previously subject of an AfD (refer Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nursery Rhymes Audio CD) but was deleted as the editor blanked the page and re-created the article under the current title Rhyme Skool with Katrina Kaif. The article does not satisfy any of the criteria under WP:NALBUMS and has had a notability tag since June 2014. Dan arndt (talk) 14:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 14:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 14:35, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Keep. Fairly notable, I do not see where it is written like an advertisement. Though some more secondary and tertiary citations like [http://www.ndtv.com/video/player/night-out/katrina-sings-along-with-rahman/141446],[http://www.orissadiary.com/ShowEntertainmentNews.asp?id=23410], [http://www.topnews.in/katrina-kaif-launch-magical-musical-nursery-kids-albumrhyme-skool-2295579], [http://www.hindustantimes.com/music/after-barbie-doll-katrina-as-animated-fairy/article1-743074.aspx] needs to be added. Mr RD 15:45, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

• Comment I'm rather on the fence at the moment but almost inclining to a a "weak keep". I was the one who had tagged it as an advert back in 2014 when it contained stuff like [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rhyme_Skool_with_Katrina_Kaif&oldid=614224534#Music_Arrangers this]. I'm surprised that the` later editors who cleaned up and copyedited the article didn't remove that tag. The references found by Mr RD are from considerably better sources than the ones currently in the article and do comment on the music, not just the launch publicity , plus there's [http://archive.indianexpress.com/news/a.r.rahman-and-katrina-kaif-launch-rhyme-skool/620907/ this one] from the Indian Express. It might scrape a pass on GNG. I just don't know enough about the Indian music scene to know what kind of music charts they have, if any, and whether this album or its Vol 2 ever placed on them. Thus, I'd be reluctant to apply the criteria at WP:ALBUM too stringently or exclude the article solely on those grounds. Voceditenore (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:: Voceditenore, I believe the article passes on GNG from some of the facts about the personalities associated with it as well as the coverage it has received in Indian media. Since Indian media news do not get crawled much efficiently in Google news therefore sometimes it becomes difficult to search for them. Talking about the persons associated with this album, A. R. Rahman is a world renowned music composer-singer while Katrina Kaif is a famous actress. In India, not much reliable and famous music charts are there therefore notability can not be judged on that behalf. Also as these are the nursery rhymes therefore coming of them in any charts is not possible either. For India related articles, please use this [http://searchindiannews.in/#gsc.tab=0 tool] to search for notable media citations. Mr RD 16:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:::I'm not sure notability can be inherited to this extent. If A. R. Rahman himself had composed the songs, it would different. Instead, they were composed by his students. But I agree that it may pass GNG on the coverage you've found. Still thinking on this, but I may well !vote "Keep" in the end. Voceditenore (talk) 16:49, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.