Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard O'Kennedy

:{{la|Richard O'Kennedy}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_O%27Kennedy Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Richard O'Kennedy}})

Fails all criteria for notability per WP:PROF. DrStrauss talk 17:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

• Keep. Even in a highly cited field [https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_7w-c7sAAAAJ&hl=en this record], which is the very first hit from the Google Scholar search linked above, shows a clear pass of WP:PROF criterion 1. 86.17.222.157 (talk) 17:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
• WP:SNOW keep. Along with the high citation counts mentioned above, his membership in the Royal Irish Academy [https://www.ria.ie/richard-okennedy] gives him a clear pass of WP:PROF#C3. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Mark the train^Discuss 18:38, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

• Snow keep. Full professor, highly cited, elected member of the RIA – clearly notable per WP:PROF. – Joe (talk) 21:47, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
• Comment - I request that this discussion run its 7-day course as opposed to being speedily kept as I think the rationale for keeping the article on the other points of WP:PROF are weak. I don't know if it's and or or but I still think discussion is better than snow in this case. DrStrauss talk 21:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
• Huh? Other points? Any single point is valid for a keep. It is certainly not required that professors pass all nine points (if it were, we would only have articles about poet-presidents). —David Eppstein (talk) 23:03, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. 10,000 people have cited his work. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2017 (UTC).

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)

• Keep It is only necessary to meet one of the criteria in WP:PROF. Read the guideline. (the basicone is being an authority in one's field--the others are mainly shortcuts to more easily prove that). DGG ( talk ) 03:33, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
• Keep passes WP:PROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.