Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ridiculously Photogenic Guy

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to List of Internet phenomena#Images . MBisanz ^talk 00:10, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

=[[Ridiculously Photogenic Guy]]=

:{{la|Ridiculously Photogenic Guy}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Ridiculously_Photogenic_Guy Stats])

:({{Find sources|Ridiculously Photogenic Guy}})

NOT NOTABLE. Herp Derp (talk) 05:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete per WP:ONEEVENT - a) If reliable sources cover the person only in the context of a single event. - this is certainly the case here. b) If that person otherwise remains, and is likely to remain, a low-profile individual. - the article clearly states "...He says he's trying to lay low. He doesn't want the attention." Ren99 wha?20px 05:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Delete There was a burst of coverage in April, 2012, and then. . . . nothing. The subject does not want the attention . Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:29, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
Summarize and redirect to List of Internet phenomena#Images. This is just notable enough to mention in the list of Internet phenomena, but not notable enough for its own entry. Given that the guy in question doesn't want an article about him, I'd recommend that the blurb reads as follows:

::Ridiculously Photogenic Guy: A photo that showed a man running a race and looking photogenic. The image became popular after it was posted to Flickr in [http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/04/06/internet-meet-ridiculously-photogenic-guy/ April 2012].

:It doesn't have to be very long or anything, but there's been just enough coverage to where it'd merit a mention. There just hasn't been enough long term coverage to show that he deserves his own article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:33, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Delete internet memes are now a dime a dozen. By all accounts, this is not encyclopaedic material and should be expunged forthwith Ohconfucius ^{ping / poke} 06:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 07:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 07:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 07:03, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Merge to List of Internet phenomena#Images, as suggested by Tokyogirl, per WP:CHEAP. Bearian (talk) 23:53, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
Merge and redirect to List of Internet phenomena#Images per Tokyogirl. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:20, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.