Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert McCulloch (priest)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Those who have reviews the sources, including one editor who had previously opined "Delete" agree that they are sufficient to support notability. Eluchil404 (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[Robert McCulloch (priest)]]=

:{{la|Robert McCulloch (priest)}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Robert McCulloch (priest)}})

  • Delete. Does not meet notability standards. Sounds like an admirable priest, but still, an ordinary one. Thousands, if not tens of thousands, of priests have done similar things. Student7 (talk) 13:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete? Per Student7. Also the three on-line references don't qualify as establishing wp:notability. The question mark is because the 4th reference is off line and the title looks more independent and I did not review it. North8000 (talk) 15:16, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

:*Support above for keep till verification. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:41, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete I can find nothing in the article or in the sources cited that indicates notability. As said above, an admirable priest, but being admired is not the same as notability. Emeraude (talk) 11:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

  • DeleteKeep Per Student7.Changed vote per sources provided by Darkness Shines. Tradedia (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep[http://www.onlinenews.com.pk/details.php?id=189193 International News Network][http://www.brecorder.com/pakistan/politics-a-policy/45747-governor-sindh-recommends-conferment-of-nishan-i-imtiaz.html Business Recorder][http://www.politics.co.uk/comment-analysis/2012/02/14/warsi-s-speech-on-militant-secularism-in-full politics.co.uk][http://www.irishcatholic.ie/site/content/country-washed-away-fr-sean-mcdonagh-ssc The Irish Catholic][http://www.fides.org/aree/news/newsdet.php?idnews=28479&lan=fra Agenzia Fides][http://www.katholieknieuwsblad.nl/nieuws/item/322-internationale-zorgen-om-mensenrechten-in-pakistan.html Katholiek Nieuwsblad][http://www.catholicweekly.com.au/article.php?classID=3&subclassID=9&articleID=7263&class=Features&subclass=A%20conversation%20with The Catholic Weekly (AUS)][http://www.nation.com.pk/pakistan-news-newspaper-daily-english-online/national/15-Feb-2012/sister-berchmans-conway-father-robert-mcculloch-given-awards The Nation][http://www.thesoutherncross.org.au/default.aspx?iid=54593&startpage=page0000013 The Southern Cross][http://www.ucanews.com/2011/08/18/facilitating-palliative-care-in-pakistan/ UCA News][http://www.thenews.com.pk/TodaysPrintDetail.aspx?ID=92793&Cat=2 The News International][http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/religionreport/robert-mcculloch-the-looming-conflict-between/3342776 ABC] Darkness Shines (talk) 01:13, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Per sources provided by Darkness Shines. Notability proven and verified. Mar4d (talk) 16:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.