Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Firestone (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:25, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
=[[Robert W. Firestone]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert W. Firestone}}
:{{la|Robert W. Firestone}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Robert W. Firestone}})
No indication of notability per relevant guideline (WP:BIO). No significant coverage by independent reliable secondary sources. Dr. Fleischman (talk) 07:27, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 15:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. A GS h-index of 15 in the highly cited field of pop-psychology is not enough to pass WP:Prof#C1. No other indications of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:56, 4 July 2016 (UTC).
- Delete again as there's still nothing for any actual independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 02:48, 7 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable clinical psychologist. Does not pass any notability guidelines for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:56, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I simply can't find enough sources, or enough notability for his publications.E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:16, 11 July 2016 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.